<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New aggregation scheme for email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chatterous.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/new-aggregation-scheme-for-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chatterous.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/new-aggregation-scheme-for-email/</link>
	<description>Reach your friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:40:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chatterous</title>
		<link>http://chatterous.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/new-aggregation-scheme-for-email/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>chatterous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chatterous.wordpress.com/?p=19#comment-38</guid>
		<description>The emails will not stop completely, they will just arrive in your inbox less often as larger digests. Is that still not an ideal scheme for you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The emails will not stop completely, they will just arrive in your inbox less often as larger digests. Is that still not an ideal scheme for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Sanzalone</title>
		<link>http://chatterous.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/new-aggregation-scheme-for-email/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Sanzalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chatterous.wordpress.com/?p=19#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Not sure if I like the scheme from a moderators point of view. If I am moderating a discussion in one of my groups by e-mail and not participating, the e-mails will stop. Should be a way to turn off this feature so there is a steady stream of information coming.

If the e-mails ever bother me, I simply @stop or @snooze them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if I like the scheme from a moderators point of view. If I am moderating a discussion in one of my groups by e-mail and not participating, the e-mails will stop. Should be a way to turn off this feature so there is a steady stream of information coming.</p>
<p>If the e-mails ever bother me, I simply @stop or @snooze them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Koss</title>
		<link>http://chatterous.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/new-aggregation-scheme-for-email/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Koss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chatterous.wordpress.com/?p=19#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Is it ever safe to be sending mail to an account that hasn&#039;t explicitly verified by clicking an email registration link?

The potential for abuse of Chatterous to send spam is really high if you send user-generated content to a non-registered user.  I would think it most prudent to only send UGC to registered opt-in user.

If you start getting lots of spam reports, your ability to deliver mail at all will be damaged by getting a high spam score.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it ever safe to be sending mail to an account that hasn&#8217;t explicitly verified by clicking an email registration link?</p>
<p>The potential for abuse of Chatterous to send spam is really high if you send user-generated content to a non-registered user.  I would think it most prudent to only send UGC to registered opt-in user.</p>
<p>If you start getting lots of spam reports, your ability to deliver mail at all will be damaged by getting a high spam score.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
